Legal Opinion

Masthope Rapids Property Owners Council v. Ury

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Frederick Ury and John Osowski (Appellants) appeal from the denial of their post-trial motions by the Court of Common Pleas of Pike County, which dismissed their case and reinstated the arbitration award in favor of Masthope Rapids Property Owners Council (Masthope). We affirm.

Masthope filed suit to collect dues and assessments on the land of Appellants. Subsequent to a district justice decision in favor of Masthope, Appellants appealed and a Board of Arbitrators also rendered a decision in favor of Masthope. Appellants then appealed to the trial court. A pre-trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milan v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Ttmar, Inc. v. SulkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Petrone v. Whirlwind, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Amoco Oil Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Ko. W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Burger v. Borough of IngramCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. City of Philadelphia, Water Revenue Bureau v. FrempongCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Frederick Renee Ruffin v. Antoine Maurice RobertsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. In Re Funds in the Possession of Conemaugh Township SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API