Legal Opinion

Smith v. Davis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1983No. 83-216PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This automobile accident case presents only one question: Whether the trial court erred in refusing to allow a policeman to give opinion testimony regarding the point of impact between the vehicles driven by one of the appellants and the appellee. While that decision was in keeping with some of our decisions, Univ. R. Evid. 701 and 702 have no doubt superseded those cases. Therefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. It is unnecessary to reach the issue of whether the appellants furnished before trial the name of a witness. The appellants’ attorney will…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nizer v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Zelayeta v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Nelson v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Gruzen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LaBruttoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Price v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. New Prospect Drilling Co. v. First Commercial Trust, N.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Townsend v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Drope v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API