Legal Opinion

United States v. Gordon McMeen

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1995No. 94-5639PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Chief Judge.

The defendant, Gordon McMeen, pled guilty to one count of making a false statement on a credit application in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. At his sentencing hearing, the District Judge imposed a two-level enhancement for “more than minimal planning” as described by the United States Sentencing Guidelines in § 2Fl.l(b)(2). The court below mistakenly based its decision upon an “Addendum” to the Presentence Report prepared by the Probation Officer which stated that the defendant participated in a larger credit card scheme in Florida. The defendant denied involvement in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Ira Silverman (90-3205) Morris G. Woodard (90-5816) and Gary Caton (90-5733/91-6506)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Shakiru Adu, A/K/A Alhaji ShakiruCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Linda Tackett (95-6127) Grayson Tackett (95-6128)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. AleoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Theodore Charles GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. William Clifford Solomon, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API