United States v. Wade

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant Michael Crouse appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on September 29, 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York (Munson, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history.

Crouse frames the issues presented as:

*79[1] “Whether the district court’s error in refusing to instruct the jury that defendant must be shown to have known (or reasonably foreseen) what type of drug he was charged with conspiring to distribute under 21 U.S.C. § 846 was harmful.”

[2] ‘Whether the substantive federal drug trafficking…