BRENCKLE v. Shaler Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Judge Kramer
Opinion by (Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part) :
I concur with the majority’s holding that this first class township has statutory authority to pass resolutions regulating the conditions of employment of police officers in a reasonable, legal and constitutional manner. I likewise concur with the majority’s reasoning that because of the nature of a policeman’s duties, such regulations properly may be more confining than upon other municipal employees. However, I feel compelled to register a dissent because it is clear to me that the resolution here in question is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McAuliffe v. Mayor and Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Chalk AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.