Cyrus v. State

Blackburn, Judge.

Jordan Marcell Cyrus appeals his convictions on two counts of aggravated assault, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions and that certain testimony regarding gang culture was improperly admitted into evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm Cyrus’ convictions.

1. In his first enumeration of error, Cyrus contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We disagree.

“On appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and [Cyrus] no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence;…