Legal Opinion
Tancred v. Holuby
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 4, 1927No. 16929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
The defendants in error, Lena Holuby, nee Gambler, and Billy Gambler, a minor, by his guardian, instituted this action against M. T. Tancred and the Travelers Insurance Company, plaintiffs in error, defendants in the trial court. The parties will be referred' to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiffs in the original petition alleged in substance that one John Gambler was a full-blood Creek Indian; that he died seized of his surplus allotment of lands on or about the 8th day of February, 1915, leaving surviving as his sole and only heirs at law his wife, Lena…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Villines v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Baker v. JackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Halsell v. BeartailSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Equitable Surety Co. v. SappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Lively v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cox v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Gaines Bros. Co. v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Gottsch v. IrelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Claxton v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Gentry v. McCurrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.