Legal Opinion

Cecil v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 22, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Nelson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lassing

Affirming.

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of incest. Two grounds are relied upon for reversal, first, that appellant and Mollie Cecil, the mother of the accusing witness, Jose Cecil, were never married, and the said Jose Cecil was not his child within the meaning of the statute; and second, because of errors committed by the trial court in failing to properly instruct the jury.

The statute under which the prosecution was had, Sec. 1219 Kentucky Statutes, reads as follows:

“Whoever shall carnally know his or her father, mother, child,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Singh v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. State v. ScarbroughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Dennis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  5. Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API