Legal Opinion
People v. Allen
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Diane Kiesel, J.
The defendant, Christopher Allen, has brought the instant motion asking this court to recuse itself from presiding over his criminal trial to avoid the appearance of bias against him. The defendant has a history with this court, and it is because of that *236history he seeks recusal. The People of the State of New York oppose the motion. For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s application is denied.
This court presided over the trial of the defendant’s divorce from his wife, Maria Axiomakaros, the complaining witness in this criminal proceeding. Ms.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MorenoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Johnson v. HornblassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. DonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. WhiteheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George A. v. Ivett A.New York Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. BornsteinNew York Supreme Court · 2013