Legal Opinion
Baltimore Steel Erectors, LLC v. The Hanover Insurance Company
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 18, 2019No. 1:18-cv-02560Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for : the use and benefit of BALTIMORE STEEL ERECTORS, LLC : v. : Civil Action No. DKC 18-2560 : THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY : MEMORANDUM OPINION Presently pending and ready for resolution in this Miller Act case is the motion to intervene filed by third party ARGO Systems, LLC (“ARGO”). (ECF No. 25). The issues have been briefed, and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, the motion to intervene will be granted. I. Background The following…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of Edward Richman Ilene Richman, Debtors. Edward Richman Ilene Richman v. First Woman's BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Alt v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. MPA Construction, Inc. v. XL Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Shanghai Meihao Electric, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.