Legal Opinion

Piper v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 26, 1935No. Docket No. 52731Published

1. Petitioner having sold property within the taxable year, receiving cash, a certified or cashier's check and a second mortgage in payment, must include the amounts of such cash and check in the computation of gain or loss therefrom, notwithstanding the check and cash so received were deposited in a banking institution that failed three days after such check was deposited and before she was able to withdraw and make use of the funds so deposited. 2. Id. - The respondent…

Read the full summary

1. Petitioner having sold property within the taxable year, receiving cash, a certified or cashier's check and a second mortgage in payment, must include the amounts of such cash and check in the computation of gain or loss therefrom, notwithstanding the check and cash so received were deposited in a banking institution that failed three days after such check was deposited and before she was able to withdraw and make use of the funds so deposited. 2. Id. - The respondent having used the face value of the mortgage received in the foregoing transaction, less 10 percent, in the determination of…

1Opinion of the Court

LILLIAS PIPER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Piper v. Commissioner

Docket No. 52731.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

32 B.T.A. 142; 1935 BTA LEXIS 990;

February 26, 1935, Promulgated

1. Petitioner having sold property within the taxable year, receiving cash, a certified or cashier's check and a second mortgage in payment, must include the amounts of such cash and check in the computation of gain or loss therefrom, notwithstanding the check and cash so received were deposited in a banking institution that failed three days after such check was deposited and before…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Piper v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API