Legal Opinion

State Division of Human Rights v. Canada Dry Rochester Bottling Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding brought pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law, petitioner, Roosevelt Richemard, seeks review of a determination of the State Division of Human Rights which dismissed his complaint upon a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that respondent, Canada Dry Bottling Co., Inc., had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory employment practice on account of race and color (Executive Law, § 297, subd 2). The determination was unanimously affirmed by the State Human Rights Appeal Board. The standard for *861…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Drug Abuse Control CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. State Division of Human Rights v. Xerox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API