State v. Munro
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1ConcurrenceEdmonds, P. J.
I concur with the majority’s reasoning and conclusions regarding defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge against him on statutory former jeopardy grounds and his motion to suppress his videotape on the ground that the affidavit in support of the motion for a search warrant did not establish probable cause that it contained records of drug transactions. I also concur with the result reached by the majority that reverses the trial court’s ruling denying defendant’s motion to suppress the contents of the videotape. I write separately, to add to the reasoning that supports the majority's result.
I…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BinnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- MacLaird v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.