Legal Opinion
State v. Oar
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1996No. 21930Published
1Opinion of the Court
924 P.2d 599 (1996)
129 Idaho 337
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Patrick S. OAR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 21930.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Lewiston, May 1996 Term.
August 20, 1996.
Rehearing Denied October 28, 1996.
Knowlton, Miles & Mercia, Lewiston, for appellant. Charles E. Kovis argued.
Alan G. Lance, Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. L. LaMont Anderson argued.
McDEVITT, Chief Justice.
Patrick S. Oar (Oar) appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of sexual battery of a minor child sixteen or seventeen years of age.
I
BACKGROU…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.