In re the Guardianship of O'Brien
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Judge.
We reverse the district court’s declaratory judgment that appellant lacks the mental capacity to marry because the district court did not apply the correct standard and did not support its determination with sufficient relevant findings, and we remand for the district court to reconsider its decision in accordance with this opinion.
FACTS
Appellant Michael O’Brien is the 27-year-old ward (and son) of respondents Timothy and Judith O’Brien. The district court appointed respondents as guardians for Michael in 2004, citing his “serious persistent mental disorder,” including di*712ag…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Parrish v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GosewischCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. GosewischCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018