Legal Opinion

Watkins v. American Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 11, 1904No. 1,984Published

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado.

1Opinion

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

A motion for a rehearing of this case has been made, based upon the conceded rule that where a contract to convey land and a promise to pay for it are entire, and each is the consideration for the other, and the defendant has received no benefits from the contract, it is a complete defense to an action upon either that the other has not been and cannot be completely performed. Manitoba Fish Co. v. Booth, 109 Fed. 594, 48 C. C. A. 564; Griffin v. American *42Gold Min. Co., 114 Fed. 887, 52 C. C. A. 507; Bank of Columbia v. Hagner, 1 Pet. 455, 465, 7 L. Ed. 219; Telfener v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of Columbia v. HagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Telfener v. RussSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Griffin v. American Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  4. Manitoba Fish Co. v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API