Legal Opinion

United States Steel Corporation v. Martin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 26, 1958No. 6 Div. 234PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Petitioner seeks review of a judgment awarding compensation to respondent under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Petitioner argues first that there was no “accident’ as provided for in the statute, Tit. 26, § 253, which provides for compensation “when personal injury or death is caused to an employee by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.”

Respondent and other employees of petitioner were in a building on petitioner’s ■preinises which it furnished for its employees to change clothes before and after work. The shift was to begin at 8:00 a. m. on April…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Massey v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Bass v. Cowikee MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Paramount Coal Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Jackson v. W. L. Smith Poultry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Decatur General Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Ex Parte StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Simmons v. F. W. Dodge CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Willis v. StoreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Thomas v. Gulf States Paper CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API