Legal Opinion

Marcus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 21, 2016No. 1D14-3250PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Appellant was charged and found guilty of sexual battery on a child under twelve *852years of age. He was sentenced to life in prison. This Court per curiam affirmed the judgment and sentence as imposed. See Marcus v. State, 51 So.3d 1157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

On March 21, 2012, Appellant filed a timely motion for postconviction relief alleging five grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. The State’s response denied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Kornegay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. v. City of Port St. LucieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. JASON VILLATORO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  2. JOHNNY LAFLIPPE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  3. Stephen Drakus v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API