In re Sentencing
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
The sentencing of criminal defendants has traditionally involved questions of fairness and justice. Judges charged with this duty approach the task with solemnity, recognizing its centrality to the rule of law and the credibility of the judiciary. See, e.g., Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, 116 S.Ct. 2035, 135 L.Ed.2d 392 (1996); Kate Stith & Jose Cabranes, Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts (1998). With the advent of the United States Sentencing Commission and Guidelines in 1981, the ability of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Rogelio Lara, Carlos Morales, Francisco Delgado, Carlos MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John S. MallonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Alcee L. Hastings, Post-Newsweek Stations, Inc., Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Gillam KerleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- United States v. DetwilerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004
- United States v. R.V.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. D.M.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. IlayayevDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.