Cutting v. Stone
Supreme Court of Vermont
Ejectment. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion delivered by the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Redfield, J.
This is an action of ejectment, referred by consent of parties generally. The referee reports in favor of the plaintiff, and states the grounds of his decision, without saying, that he intended to decide the case according to the strict rules of law. It *572seems to us, therefore, that no question can be raised upon the report, in regard to any question of law decided by the referee. No rule of law is perhaps better settled than this.
This very case is a good illustration of the rule. The plaintiff’s deed defines his lot, upon the west, by a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Mathews v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Melendy v. Clark P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Gordon's Admr. v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Thompson v. WarnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890