Legal Opinion

City of Pensacola v. Kirby

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 18, 1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

47 So.2d 533 (1950)

CITY OF PENSACOLA et al.

v.

KIRBY.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

July 18, 1950.

F. Churchill Mellen and Coe & Eggart, all of Pensacola, for appellants.

Yonge, Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for appellee.

SEBRING, Justice.

The City of Pensacola has appealed from an adverse decree rendered in a suit brought by the appellee, a taxpayer of the city, to enjoin the execution of a contract between the city and one Gene Gevaldo for the maintenance of its parking meters.

The charter of the City of Pensacola provides: "Contract For Public Work. — Any public work or improvement may be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willis v. HathawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Culpepper v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. William A. Berbusse, Jr., Inc. v. North Broward Hosp. Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Marriott Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. WOOD-HOPKINS CONTRACT. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. COUCH CONST. CO., INC. v. Department of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Gleason v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API