Legal Opinion

Woodall v. Hayt, Hayt & Landau

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1991No. A90A2101PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Chief Judge.

Kenny R. Woodall filed suit against J. F. Shaw Agency, Inc. (“Shaw”), alleging malicious abuse of process (later amended to allege malicious use of process) in a suit on account previously filed against him by Shaw. Shaw filed a third party complaint against the attorneys who represented it in the prior suit, Hayt, Hayt & Landau (“Hayt”), alleging that Hayt had both filed the action and then dismissed it without authority. Hayt’s motion for summary judgment on the main claim was granted by the trial court, and Woodall appeals.

The record reveals that in the prior action,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yost v. TorokSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Hamilton v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Vogtle v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Ostroff v. CoynerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Empire Shoe Co. v. Nico Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seckinger v. HoltzendorfCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Freeman v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Ackerman & Co. v. LostoccoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. COEN v. APTEAN, INC. Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. Timothy F. Coen v. Aptean, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API