Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Allen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1887No. 2204PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Eastland. Tried below before the Hon. T. B. Wheeler.

1Opinion of the Court

Maltbie, Judge.

This suit was filed by appellant, J. M. Mitchell, against appellee, W. M. Allen, in the district court of Eastland county, to recover five hundred dollars and interest, alleging that Allen executed two notes to Mitchell for borrowed money, one for two, and the other for three hundred dollars, and that Allen afterwards obtained possession of said notes by fraud, and refused to return or pay them off.

Appellee answered by a general denial and by plea in reconvention, admitting that he had borrowed the money, or part of it, and executed his notes as charged; further alleging that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glasscock v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Stuart v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Trimble v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Easterling v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Caprito v. Grisham-Hunter CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Arnett v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Runnells v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Magruder v. PoultonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API