Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal A Sweebe, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2011No. Docket No. 297156Published

1DissentO’Connell, J.

I respectfully dissent.

This appears to be a case of first impression in Michigan. The majority concludes that the payment on an open account that relates to the sale of goods is subject to the four-year limitations period in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), MCL 440.2725(1). I disagree with the majority, for two reasons. First, the current state of the law in Michigan requires a different conclusion. Second, the UCC does not abrogate common-law jurisprudence in Michigan concerning open accounts.

*76I. CURRENT STATE OF THE LAW

The current state of the law in Michigan is as follows: Payment on an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Rathbun v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Wayne County v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API