Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1889No. 13,867PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Owen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

— Jesse Vawter was in the service of the appellant, in the capacity of a brakeman on one of its freight trains, and on the morning of June 11th, 1885, while engaged in the discharge of the duties of his service, at Stinesville, his leg was broken. Dr. Judah, a competent and skilful surgeon, of Stinesville, was called to treat the injured man. He set, dressed, and bandaged the broken limb, and gave the unfortunate man such treatment as his injury re*354quired. After the broken limb had been set and bandaged the conductor caused the appellees, who lived at Gosport, to be summoned by telegraph, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McMurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. StockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hunicke v. Meramec Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Godshaw v. J. N. Struck & Bro.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  3. Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. MylottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Holmes v. McAllisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API