Legal Opinion

Hotzfield v. Hotzfield

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1948No. Gen. No. 44,308PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

Petitioner filed his complaint for divorce against respondent, who answered it and also filed her cross-complaint for divorce. After petitioner filed his reply to the cross-complaint the cause was heard, by agreement, on the cross-complaint and reply, and a decree of divorce was entered in favor of respondent. The decree found that the parties had entered into an agreement to settle and adjust their respective property rights, and the agreement was approved by the chancellor. The following is paragraph 1 of the agreement: “The wife shall have in lieu of any alimony a lump sum settlement of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Audubon v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Cole v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Herrick v. HerrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Smith v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Adler v. AdlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hager v. HagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Walters v. WaltersIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Walters v. WaltersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  4. Roberts v. RobertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. Monteleone v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API