Legal Opinion

Third National Bank & Trust Co. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judge directed a verdict for the defendant in this action of tort and contract for fire damage to a building caused by the negligence of the defendant tenant. The judge did not require the defendant to specify the reasons on which its motion for a directed verdict was based, but stated for the record that it was the judge’s opinion that the lessee was exempted from liability by a clause in the lease. It is therefore open to the defendant to support the ruling on another grouhd. Connors v. Wick, 317 Mass. 628, 630. McKinstry v. New York, N. H. & H. R.R. 338 Mass. 785. As the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connors v. WickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Dolan v. Suffolk Franklin Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  3. Wardwell v. George H. Taylor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  4. McKinstry v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Currie v. Lee Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Conant v. Sherwin L. Kantrovitz, P.C.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Donahoe v. Maggiano's Holding Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API