Legal Opinion

Hall v. Henry

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1924No. 4310PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. “A court of equity will not interfere with the internal affairs of a religious organization, when no property rights are involved; for the reason that civil courts have no jurisdiction of such matters and can not take jurisdiction of them, whether they have been adjudicated by the ecclesiastical courts or not. Tucker v. Paulk, 148 Ga. 228 (96 S. E. 339); Watson v. Garvin, 54 Mo. 353 (2); Mack v. Kime, 129 Ga. 1 (58 S. E. 184, 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 675). See Watson v. Jones, 13 Wall. (U. S.) 679, 727, 733 (20 L. ed. 666).” Gibson v. Singleton, 149 Ga. 502 (101 S. E. 178).

2. The evidence for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mack v. KimeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Watson v. GarvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Tucker v. PaulkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Gibson v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. JarrielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Knowles v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. McCluskey v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Canterbury v. CanterburyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Carlson v. FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API