Legal Opinion

In re V.W.B.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1983No. J-83-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNISH, Judge:

The decisive issue in this case is whether notice of the possibility of adult prosecution is a constitutional pre-requisite to the admissibility of a juvenile’s confession. We hold that it is not.

Appellant, V.W.B., was a child seventeen (17) years of age at the time the alleged offense of Robbery by Force occurred. He was eighteen years of age when he confessed he had committed the crime. V.W.B. was certified to stand trial as an adult in Tulsa County District Court, from which certification he appeals.

The offense occurred on August 23, 1981 when V.W.B. and two others…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Swisher v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Walter L. Harling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  5. State v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JDL, JR. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Matter of VWBCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API