Legal Opinion

Hanson v. State Farm Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 2003No. CX-02-1620PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellants argue that the district court erred when it determined that a one-third contingent fee arrangement that the trustee entered into before his appointment did not apply to appellant law firm’s representation after the trustee’s appointment. Because we conclude that the trustee’s authority related back to his representative actions prior to his appointment, we hold that the one-third contingent fee agreement is valid, and we reverse.

FACTS

This case concerns attorney fees in a lawsuit filed over the death of 9-year-old Jenna Hegstrom, who was killed in a car accident.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Holt v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Hachmann v. Mayo ClinicDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shaira Mattingly v. American Family Insurance, Kathleen PlaschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API