Cultor Corporation and Cultor Food Science, Inc.,plaintiffs-Appellants v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Cultor Corporation and Cultor Food Science, Inc. (together, “Cultor”) appeal the decisions of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 1 granting summary judgment that the A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. (“Staley”) does not infringe the asserted claims of either of United States patents Nos. 5,667,593 (“the ’593 patent”) and 5,645,647 (“the ’647 patent”) and denying leave to amend the complaint. We affirm the decisions of the district court.
Background
The ’593 and ’647 patents, both of which are entitled “Modified Polydextrose and Process…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Zahra v. Town of SoutholdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Amerford International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Young Dental Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Q3 Special Products, Inc., and David G. KraenzleCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Ecolab, Inc. v. Envirochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.