Legal Opinion
Schlotzsky's, Inc. v. Hyde
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided August 25, 2000No. A00A1172; A00A1173; A00A1174PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ellington, Judge.
In these consolidated cases, the appellees allege they contracted Hepatitis A from eating tainted food at a Schlotzsky’s Deli franchise owned and operated by Tidwell Food Company, Inc. Both Schlotzsky’s, Inc. and the appellees moved for summary judgment on whether Schlotzsky’s, as franchisor, was vicariously liable under an actual agency theory for Tidwell Food Company’s alleged negligence. The trial court denied Schlotzsky’s motion and granted partial summary judgment to appellees Mary and David Hyde and Beatrice Coker in Case No. A00A1172; to Kathleen Cone in Case No.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Anderson v. Turton Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- McMullan v. Georgia Girl Fashions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- McGuire v. Radisson Hotels International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Frey v. PepsiCo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. ClementeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Kerl v. Dennis Rasmussen, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Delise diaz v. Autozoners, LLC, D/B/A AutozoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Pizza K, Inc. v. SantagataCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Rainey v. LangenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.