Legal Opinion

Ronco v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2007No. 64S05-0604-CR-152PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 64A05-0505-CR-271

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

We adopted Jury Rule 28 to give trial judges more flexibility in dealing with jury deliberations that come to a standstill. It was premature for the trial court in this case to declare an impasse after receiving a question of law from the jury during deliberations. On the other hand, the trial court did appropriately answer the jury’s legal query under Ind.Code § 34-36-1-6. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

The State charged appellant Jason Ron-co with battery to law enforcement,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Tincher v. DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Foster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ronco v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Treadway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wayne A. Campbell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Henri v. CurtoIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. C.P. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Parks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API