Legal Opinion

State v. Miller, 90035 (6-13-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 2008No. 90035Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant Christopher Miller appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial. Miller assigns the following errors for our review:

"I. Defendant was denied due process of law when he was not granted post-conviction relief on his motion for a new trial or post-conviction relief."
"II. Defendant was denied due process of law when the court summarily denied defendant's motion for a new trial or, in the alternative, petition for post-conviction relief."

{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we affirm the trial court's decision. The apposite…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. OttenOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API