Legal Opinion
State v. Miller, 90035 (6-13-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 2008No. 90035Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant Christopher Miller appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial. Miller assigns the following errors for our review:
"I. Defendant was denied due process of law when he was not granted post-conviction relief on his motion for a new trial or post-conviction relief."
"II. Defendant was denied due process of law when the court summarily denied defendant's motion for a new trial or, in the alternative, petition for post-conviction relief."
{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we affirm the trial court's decision. The apposite…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. OttenOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.