Legal Opinion

Bach v. Slidell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1846PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

King, J.*

The plaintiff instituted this action, to compel the defendant to fulfil his engagements contained in the following agreement entered into between the parties:

“ New Orleans, 26th December, 1842.
“ John M. Bach, acting for himself, P. A. Delachaise and others, having agreed to waive all claims to a tract of land designated as section eight, township thirteen, range eleven east, entered under the preemption laws, under what is commonly styled a float, said entry being numbered 1264 in the entries of the eastern district of Louistana, and to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. De La Vergne Refrigerating Machine Co. v. New Orleans & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  2. Castano v. BellinaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API