Legal Opinion

Live Stock State Bank v. Hise

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1921No. 22,429PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $5,000 upon a promissory note. The garnishee disclosed an indebtedness of $3,765.46, and the First National Bank of Poplar, Montana, claiming this fund, filed its complaint in intervention. The case was tried before Nye, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying its motion to amend the findings and conclusions in certain respects, intervener appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Action upon a promissory note given by defendant Hise to defendant American Cattle Company and by that company sold and transferred to plaintiff. At the time of the commencement of the action garnishment summons was issued and duly served upon the garnishee, Percy Vittum & Company, a corporation doing a general live stock business at the South St. Paul stockyards. The garnishee disclosed an indebtedness to defendant Hise in the sum of $3,765.46. Thereafter the First National Bank of Poplar, Montana, intervened in the action, claiming by its complaint of intervention the sole ownership of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hove v. Stanhope State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Lewis v. Traders' BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Hillsdale Distillery Co. v. BriantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fornoff v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  2. First National Bank v. Rogers-Amundson-Flynn Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Baird v. SimonstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Baird v. SimonstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Marx v. MaddreyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API