Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 27, 1919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Webster District Court. — R. M. Wright, Judge. Action to recover damages resulted in a directed verdict for defendant and judgment thereon. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, C. J.

I. The plaintiff was in the employment of defendant, in the evening of March 17, 1915, as one of the helpers in a switching crew. At about 10:30 o’clock, he attempted to get on a car, for the purpose of switching the same and placing it in a train which was being made up. The car was of a style known as the “Gondola” or Hart Convertible. The sides of the car are fastened with hinges at or near the top, with clasps at the bottom. When the clasps are broken or unfastened at the bottom, the sides swing outward: that is, when lifted by hand, or swung by a movement of the car. The car, at the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  4. Lumley v. Wabash R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Meyer v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reed v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. Richardson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Barnard v. Cedar Rapids City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Nygard v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Owens v. Norwood-White Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API