Swing v. Humbird
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action by the trustee of the Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Cincinnati, Ohio, hereafter referred to as the company, to *2recover from the defendants the sum of $332.06, alleged to be due from the defendants for an assessment upon certain insurance policies issued by the company to them. The answer put in issue the allegations of the complaint as to the assessment, and alleged, in effect, that under their policy contract with the company they were not liable to assessment to pay its losses. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and findings of fact favorable to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Western Telegraph Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Straw & Ellsworth Manufacturing Co. v. L. D. Kilbourne Boot & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Langworthy v. GardingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Given v. RettewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- In re Minneapolis Mut. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- State v. Mortgage Security Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Swing v. Red River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Woodward v. SonnesynSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Swing v. Cloquet Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.