Peter Rock Associates v. Town of North Haven
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Peter Rock Associates, appeals from the judgment rendered in its favor by the *2trial court, which consisted of a committee of three judge trial referees,1 pursuant to the plaintiffs appeal and application for review of statement of compensation for condemnation.2 On appeal to this court, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly excluded evidence offered to prove the reasonable probability that the zoning classification of the subject real property would change and affect the value of the property, which was taken by condemnation during the appeal of the zoning…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Borough of Jewett City v. Slater Mill Assoc., No. 121714 (Feb. 19, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002