Legal Opinion

State v. Edmundson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1956No. 290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants challenge the ruling of the trial court in denying their motions made in Superior Court for judgment as of non-suit. Suffice it to say, in this connection, the Court holds the evidence offered by the State, taken in the light most favorable to the State, as is done when considering demurrer to the evidence, G.S. 15-173, is sufficient to take the case to the jury and to support the verdict of guilty as to each defendant. See S. v. Jaynes, 198 N.C. 728, 153 S.E. 410; S. v. McLamb, 235 N.C. 251, 69 S.E. 2d 537, and cases cited.

The motion of defendant McKinley Braswell for certiorari…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. . JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Edwards v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. MaidesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API