Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Ackerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Richard Ackerman, Irene Ackerman and Milton Ackerman appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated October 17, 1988, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Richard and Irene Ackerman are the sole owners of a one-family residential dwelling known as 140 Elm Drive,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Persichilli v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Schwartz v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spinillo v. Strober Long Island Building Material Centers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Krukowski v. SteffensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Danish v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Devodier v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Clayson v. OldfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API