Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Hewitt

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1858PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ACTION for goods sold and delivered, brought against the defendants as partners.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

Upon the trial of this cause the defendants were sought to be made liable as partners. The goods were sold to the defendant William E. Hewitt, and charged to him, on the plaintiffs' books. He selected all the goods but one parcel, and ordered the bill made out to him. Afterwards the plaintiffs took the note of William E. Hewitt in payment of the account. There was no evidence showing that Henry was a partner, either from his own admission, or from any proof of an agreement between the defendants. The plaintiff relied upon two facts, vizThat there had been a partnership between the defendants,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McPherson v. RathboneNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Thorn v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Foster v. . BookwalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Southwick & Wheelock v. McGovernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Hoppock v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Holt v. AllenbrandNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Rives v. MichaelsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API