Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ward

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 24, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feely, S.

Nearly twenty years before her death in 1935 this testatrix made her last will, wherein she directed, among other things, that if her husband did not outlive her -— which proved to be the fact •— then her executors should divide her estate into eight equal parts and pay over one of those parts “ to each of my children living at the time of my death, or to the heirs at law of any children of mine now living who shall not survive me.”

To ascertain the persons whom she meant to designate by the words “ heirs at law ” in the alternate clause just quoted has now become, in the sequence of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilliam v. . Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. In re the Estate of CanfieldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Matter of CanfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Howley v. RomagnaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broderson v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Long v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re Hornby's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API