Sanford v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated assault. Punishment was probated after being assessed at confinement for five years and a fine of $1,000.
Appellant raises three grounds of error on appeal. The sufficiency of evidence is not challenged. It is contended that appellant was erroneously indicted for an offense which was governed by a more specific section of the Penal Code, and, in two grounds of error he argues the trial court erred in denying a request for an instruction to the jury on “recklessness.”
Ground of error one is stated as follows:
“That the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- McBrayer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ex Parte HarrellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Briceno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Chanslor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Graham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1997
- Cerda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Chanslor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.