Legal Opinion

Brannenburg v. Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, & Cleveland Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

This was an action, commenced before a justice of the peace, for the value of a mare killed by the cars, &c., of the company, at a place where the road was not fenced. Answer filed. Trial; and judgment for the plaintiff for 100 dollars. Defendants appealed to the Cir*104cuit Court, where the plaintiff filed a demurrer to the first paragraph of the answer, which was overruled, and judgment for defendants.

The said paragraph is, in substance, that if the animal, was “lured, &c., it was at the same time and place at which another horse was injured, for which said plaintiff: brought suit before said…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1818

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wheeler Savings Bank v. TraceySupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. Roby v. EggersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Watson v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Craig v. BroocksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API