Legal Opinion

Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1970No. 42489PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

H. E. Bailey, Dr. C. Q. Smith and Earl Welch, Trustees, were petitioners and The Regents of the University of Oklahoma was respondent in the trial court. We will refer to them respectively as the Trustees and the Regents.

Trustees instituted this action in the lower court alleging they were the duly acting Trustees of the Testamentary Trust of Joseph L. Daniel; that the trust .had accomplished the purpose for which it was created; and that the term of the trust had expired. Trustees asked the court to assume general superintending power over the trust for the purpose of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Inglis v. Trustees of Sailor's Snug Harbour in City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Beidler v. DehnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Sheldon v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Beardsley v. Selectmen of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  5. Blair v. Bishop's Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Irrevocable Trust of McKeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. In re the Irrevocable Trust of McKeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Rose v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API