State v. Waul

The intervener and appellant, Peterson,' has filed a petition for rehearing. The ground upon which a rehearing is asked is that this court, in its opinion herein, 59 S. D. 484, 240 N. W. 854, overlooked the fact that, when the defendant, Waul, rented the car, he did not disclose that he was in fact Waul, but gave his name as “J. J. Miller,” and that his identity was not known to intervener or intervener’s employee who rented the car. This facts was not overlooked, but was attempted to be considered in the next to the last paragraph of the opinion. However, there 'being no specific reference…