Legal Opinion

Rosado v. Bowen

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 22, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-1766PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LECHNER, District Judge.

This is a class action 1 in which the plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief from federal and state regulations promulgated under § 402(a)(38) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (“DEFRA”), 2 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38).

Specifically, plaintiffs alleged seven causes of action and complain that: (1) the federal regulation implementing the DE-FRA provision, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B) and New Jersey practice which include plaintiffs in AFDC assistance units, violate the DEFRA amendment, 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38), as well as 42 U.S.C. § 606(a)(1)…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Malloy v. EichlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Johnson v. WingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. 23 soc.sec.rep.ser. 551, Medicare&medicaid Gu 37,497Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API