Legal Opinion

Crossland v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1918No. 9485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from County Court, Harmon County : A. C. Abernathy, Judge. Proceeding by the State of Oklahoma for the confiscation of two automobiles, with intervention and claim by Grady. Crossland and another. Judgment for the state, motion for new trial overruled, and from the judgment and order, claimants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SPRINGER, C.

This action was begun in the county court of Harmon county, Okla., for the purpose of confiscating two certain automobiles. It is charged that the automobiles in question had been used for the purpose of transporting intoxicating liquors, and that by virtue of chapter 188, 1917 Session Laws of Oklahoma, they should be con-fisca fed.

We gather from the record in this case that on or about the 22d day of August, 1917, W. B. Burgess, Walter Crossland. Frank Crossland, and Bob Norman went to Dod-sonville, Tex., and secured a gallon of whisky from the express company at that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Rupard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baldridge v. State Ex Rel. SayeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Scwake v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API