BLI Construction Co. v. Debari

*300Stolz, Judge.

This evidence does not demand a finding, as it did in Dekle v. Todd, 132 Ga.App. 156 (207 SE2d 654)thatthe plaintiff voluntarily assumed a known risk of injury in doing a dangerous and foolhardy act so as to preclude recovery. Under contract specifications the defendant was charged with taking proper safety precautions in connection with the work. It constructed three walls, two of which apparently were blown over during a severe thunderstorm. The third, which had withstood the storm and been standing for a week or two at the time, was then braced, a precaution which had been…